Legal Opinion
Atasi Corporation v. Seagate Technology
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 26, 1988No. 88-1054PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an unpublished order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, entered March 3, 1987. The district court granted a motion by Seagate Technology (Seagate) to disqualify the law firm of Skjerven, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel (the Skjerven firm) from representing Atasi Corporation (Atasi). On June 5, 1987, the district court certified the order for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), (c) (1982). On October 8,1987, we granted Atasi’s petition for review. We affirm.
Background
Atasi commenced the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gas-A-Tron of Arizona and Coinoco v. Union Oil Company of California, Petrol Stops Northwest v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Paul E. Iacono Structural Engineer, Inc. v. Robert R. Humphrey, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Saes Getters S.P.A. v. Aeronex, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002
- Employers Insurance v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Marshall v. State of New York Div. of State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Baldwin Hardware Corp. v. Franksu Enterprise Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.