Legal Opinion
Employers Insurance v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 29, 1988No. C-86-4890 EFLPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
This diversity case began as a declaratory judgment action by an insurance company seeking a declaration that it is not liable for third-party claims alleging faulty work by one of its insureds, a home construction firm and developer. Plaintiff has now moved to disqualify the primary defendant’s lead counsel. Defendant has in turn cross-moved to disqualify plaintiff’s main counsel. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies both motions.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Albert D. Seeno Construction Company (collectively with associated defendants “Seeno”) is a real estate…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Buckley v. Airshield Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Commonwealth Insurance v. Graphix Hot Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Henriksen v. Great American Savings & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.