Legal Opinion

Baldwin Hardware Corp. v. Franksu Enterprise Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 4, 1996No. Nos. 93-1185, 93-1186PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Klayman & Associates, P.C., a law firm (“K & A”), challenges sanctions imposed on the firm by the trial court for failure to comply with local rules and for “unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings,” during K & A’s defense in design patent and trademark infringement litigation brought by Baldwin Hardware Corporation (“Baldwin”) against FrankSu Enterprise Corporation, Mr. Frank Su, and Decorators Accessories Ltd. (“Decorax”). Larry Klayman, K & A’s lead counsel in the litigation, appeals from the trial court’s order permanently prohibiting Mr. Klayman…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Richard R. SiblaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bank of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. William K. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Sheller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Transclean Corp. v. Bridgewood Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  5. United States v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API