Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 8, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MITCHELL, Judge.

Dewey Scott Frazier was given a full and complete evidentiary hearing on his habeas corpus petition which was treated as a complaint under the Post Conviction Procedure Act. At the hearing Frazier was represented by court appointed counsel. It was expressly agreed by Frazier and his counsel and the district attorney that the hearing be held on the records of the cases and stipulations made by the parties.

Dewey Scott Frazier, who will be referred to as the petitioner, represented by court appointed counsel, has appealed the dismissal, after an evidentiary hearing, of his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McKannay v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. McMath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  4. Frazier v. LaneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API