Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1928PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

The statute involved in this cause was taken from New York, and was applied and construed by the Supreme Court of that state in People v. Gowasky, 244 N. Y. 451 (155 N. E. 737), prior to its adoption by the legislature of this state. So far as this jurisdiction is concerned, that statute is a new creation; but similar legislation has been in force and effect in other jurisdictions of this country for many years.

1. The defendant contends that Chapter 334, General Laws of Oregon, 1927, applies to “similar felonies” only, and asserts that he finds much law in support of this contention. In some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. People v. GowaskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1958

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API