Legal Opinion

People v. Farrell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1906No. Docket No. 220PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Error to Missaukee; Chittenden, J.. John H. Farrell was convicted of murder , in the first degree, and sentenced to imprisonment for life in the State prison at' Jackson. It appearing that respondent had formerly been convicted of manslaughter upon the same information, the judgment is reversed, and remanded with directions to sentence respondent for manslaughter.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been here before, and is reported in 137 Mich. 127. A reference to the opinion then filed will be useful in arriving at an understanding of the questions now involved. Respondent was informed against for murder. Upon the first trial he was convicted of manslaughter. Upon the second trial the respondent was convicted of the offense of murder in the first degree. The case is brought here by writ of error. Counsel for respondent again discuss many of the questions, presented by them when the case was here before. We have re*266examined the questions so presented, and are not inclined…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. People v. MeserveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. People v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. SorrentinoWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API