Legal Opinion
In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 2014No. 11 MD 2262(NRB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On March 29, 2013, we issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’1 complaints, which alleged that they suffered injury based on the defendants’ manipulation of the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In re LIBOR-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig., 935 F.Supp.2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (“LIBOR /”). Among, other determinations relevant to the pending motions, we dismissed exchange-based plaintiffs’ claims under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) to the…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Nguyen v. FXCM Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re London Silver Fixing, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.