Harvey v. Levine
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.
This is a patent case involving a design for a sealing gasket for use in connecting toilet bowls with soil pipes. Defendants have filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment to the effect that the subject patent is invalid and not infringed. Three sets of interrogatories under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., have been filed, to some of which objections have been made.
1. Objections to Defendant’s Interrogatories to Plaintiff Paul E. Thies.
Defendant Levine filed twenty-one interrogatories directed to plaintiff Thies on August 7, 1959.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Superior Communications v. Earhugger, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. v. On Point Events, LP.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Duran v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Stovall v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.