Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Berry

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 1929No. 12564PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

In 1925, the Bank of Latta closed its doors and a receiver was appointed to take charge of its affairs. Subsequently, this action was brought against the directors of the bank by the plaintiffs, certain of its depositors, upon the theory that the directors were liable to the plaintiffs, as depositors, for the loss of certain deposits made by them and received by the bank while insolvent. This appeal is from an order of his Honor, Judge- Dennis, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

The allegations of the complaint, for the purposes…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hun v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Fusz v. SpaunhorstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  4. Seale v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Greenfield Savings Bank v. AbercrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. American Bank Trust Shares, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1976
  3. Multimedia Publishing of South Carolina, Inc. v. MullinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Peeples v. HornikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  5. Ducworth v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API