Legal Opinion

Seale v. Baker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1888No. 2373PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Judge.

The court below sustained general demurrers to the petition and dismissed the suit, from which judgment this appeal is taken. It now devolves on us to determine whether or not, on tne case stated in the petition, appellant is entitled to recover.

It is alleged in the petition that on the nineteenth day of December, 1885, and for one year preceding that date, appellees were directors of the banking corporation, “The City Bank of Houston,” actively directing and controlling its affairs and the conduct of its said business, and representing themselves and were generally and publicly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. . SkiddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Lyman v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Baker v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kingston v. Helm, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Barclay v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jerry D. Wheat, Ben D. SudderthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Hoehn v. CrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API