Legal Opinion
Peeples v. Hornik
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 5, 1929No. 12773PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
This is an appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge Gri'mball, ordering a compulsory reference to the Master to hear and determine all issues of law and fact. The plaintiff entered objection to the motion of the defendant for such reference and now appeals from the order granting the same.
Prior to the passage of Act Feb. 7, 1928, 35 St. at Large, p. 1149, it had been consistently held by this Court that under Section 593 of Code Civ. Proc. 1922: “A compulsory order of reference to try the issues of both law and fact may be made only…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fludd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Kelly v. DolanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Georgian Company v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- People's Bank v. HelmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Jefferies v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Beaty v. Massey-Hite Grocery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Burch v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.