Legal Opinion

Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1924No. 18194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, Hedlnnd Box & Lumber Company, a corporation, owns and operates a sawmill, planing mill and box factory, located at the city of Spokane. Sometime prior to October 2, 1922, it *459purchased from the United States, through its forestry service, all of the merchantable timber standing and growing upon certain described land forming a part of a government forest reservation situated in the state of Idaho. The timber consisted of various kinds, and amounted in quantity, according to the cruise of a member of the forestry service, to approximately fourteen million five hundred thousand…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Gould v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. WillieTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. McDougall v. O'ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jones v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Whatcom Builders Supply Co. v. H. D. Fowler, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Incomm, Inc. v. Thermo-Spa, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API