Legal Opinion
Incomm, Inc. v. Thermo-Spa, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 12, 1991No. File 95128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.
This is a dispute between an advertising agency and a spa manufacturer concerning an ill-fated contract to produce a brochure. The plaintiff, Incomm, Inc., has sued the defendant, Thermo-Spa, Inc., for money damages for work that the plaintiff performed for the defendant pursuant to the contract. An evidentiary hearing was held on February 13,1991, at which the court heard the testimony of A1 Pirozzoli, the plaintiffs president and creative director, and Andrew Toumas, the vice president in charge of advertising for the defendant, and received a number of documentary exhibits. For the reasons…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- G-W-L, Inc. v. RobichauxTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- John J. Brennan Construction Corporation, Inc. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group Of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Aliki Foods, LLC v. Otter Valley Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Directory Publishers Inc. v. Lake Country Hearth & LeisureAuburn City Court · 2002
- Dsp Software Engineering v. Nct Group, No. Cv00 037 00 62 S (Aug. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000