Legal Opinion

Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1925No. 19230. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

— Plaintiff brought an action to recover upon a logging contract. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for $22,310. Upon appeal we held that, inasmuch as the sums of money due under the contract were not payable excepting at certain specified times, a judgment for the whole amount at the time of trial would be more valuable than the right to receive the money at a later period, and that therefore the amount of the judgment should be reduced. The opinion is found in Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co., 129 Wash. 457, 225 Pac. 659, 227 Pac. 518, and the pertinent portion of the opinion is as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spalding v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Barnhart v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bank of New Mexico v. Earl Rice Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Hadley v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API