Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
— Plaintiff brought an action to recover upon a logging contract. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for $22,310. Upon appeal we held that, inasmuch as the sums of money due under the contract were not payable excepting at certain specified times, a judgment for the whole amount at the time of trial would be more valuable than the right to receive the money at a later period, and that therefore the amount of the judgment should be reduced. The opinion is found in Yarno v. Hedlund Box & Lumber Co., 129 Wash. 457, 225 Pac. 659, 227 Pac. 518, and the pertinent portion of the opinion is as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spalding v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Barnhart v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Guyman v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Bank of New Mexico v. Earl Rice Construction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Hadley v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.