United States ex rel. Filippini v. Day
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
Upon the argument the respondent conceded that in the ease of an alien seaman the unlawfulness of the original entry standing alone was not enough to justify deportation. Under section 34 (Comp. St. § 4289%s), the alien must be shown to be independently excludable under the basic law. U. S. ex rel. Gioia v. Curran (D. C. May 8, 1924) 11 F.(2d) 904. Similarly it was conceded that there was no basis for a finding that the relator was likely to become a public charge. There remains, therefore, only the question of his entry on June 8,1923, in excess of the quota at that time…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States ex rel. David v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- United States ex rel. Gioia v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States ex rel. Danikas v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- United States ex rel. United States Lines v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bildt v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States ex rel. Vounas v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- United States ex rel. Poppovich v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.