Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Vounas v. Hughes

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 2, 1940No. 7470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

There are no “harder cases” than those resulting from the operation of the Immigration laws.1 Particularly is this so when the application is to expulsion rather than exclusion. To be shown the 'promised land is bad; to have loved and lost it is worse.2 Fortunately, the appeal of the case at bar is not to the judicial heart, hut to the judicial mind.

*172The relator is an alien seaman. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the learned District Judge are correct by concession. So, the legal position therein described must be accepted. They are set forth in United…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Phillippides v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Santarelli v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Vincenzo Anselmo v. H. L. Hardin, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization for the 21st Immigration DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. Prince Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API