Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Gioia v. Curran

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, Circuit Judge.

I think that this writ must be sustained. The question turns upon the meaning of section 34 of the Immigration Act (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 428914s) and of section 2 (d) of the Quota Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 4289%a), especially upon that clause in the second proviso of the lat-¡ *905ter which reads, "aliens returning from a temporary visit abroad.” , This alien came in originally on August 28, 1920, as a deserting seaman, and his entry was therefore illegal. He lived here continuously until January 29, 1924, when he went abroad to fetch…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Patton v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Georgas v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. United States ex rel. Filippini v. DayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  3. In re FanariotisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. United States ex rel. De Visser v. FlynnDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
  5. United States ex rel. Anderson v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API