Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. White

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Kent. Trover. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, O. J.

The action in this case was teoyer. The ■ defendants purchased the logs in question from Sheridan & Hamilton, who cut them upon plaintiff’s lands, and who were unquestionably trespassers in so doing. They, Shei’idan & Hamilton, made no claim or pretence of having cut the logs under circumstances tending even to show good faith on their part. Sheridan & Hamilton sold the logs to defendants, afloat in Black creek. It was claimed, and we . shall so assume, that defendants in making the purchase acted in entire good faith; they, afterwards run the logs \ into Elat river and there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetherbee v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Winchester v. CraigMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Isle Royale Mining Co. v. HertinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gates v. Rifle Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API