Tuttle v. White
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. Trover. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, O. J.
The action in this case was teoyer. The ■ defendants purchased the logs in question from Sheridan & Hamilton, who cut them upon plaintiff’s lands, and who were unquestionably trespassers in so doing. They, Shei’idan & Hamilton, made no claim or pretence of having cut the logs under circumstances tending even to show good faith on their part. Sheridan & Hamilton sold the logs to defendants, afloat in Black creek. It was claimed, and we . shall so assume, that defendants in making the purchase acted in entire good faith; they, afterwards run the logs \ into Elat river and there…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wetherbee v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Winchester v. CraigMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Isle Royale Mining Co. v. HertinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Gates v. Rifle Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.