Legal Opinion
Communications Workers of America v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1979No. 78-333PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
It is well settled that:
“The filing of an application for rehearing before the Public Utilities Commission is a jurisdictional prerequisite to an error proceeding from the order of the Commission to this Court, and only such matters as are set forth in such application can be urged or relied upon in an error proceeding in this Court.” Paragraph six of the syllabus in Travis v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1931), 123 Ohio St. 355.
It is uneontroverted that appellant has failed to file án application for rehearing of the commission’s order of January 11, 1978. Thus, an appeal from that order by appellant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Travis v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Harrison v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ohio Domestic Violence Network v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cowan v. Ohio Dept. of Jobs & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Gallo Displays, Inc. v. Cleveland Public PowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ohio Domestic Violence Network v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994