Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1938No. 27148PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

On June 21, 1938, the appellants filed with the Public Utilities Commission their notice of appeal from an order entered on April 26, 1938, in formal case No. 3307 which has heretofore been designated as the statewide Bell Telephone Company rate ease.

In the prayer of the notice of appeal appellants seek to have that order of April 26, 1938, reversed. In the notice it is likewise stated that “on the 25th day of May, 1938, appellants filed with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio their petition and application for rehearing of said cause in accordance with General Code of Ohio,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Dworken v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crosby-Edwards v. Ohio Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ohio Domestic Violence Network v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Communications Workers of America v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cowan v. Ohio Dept. of Jobs & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. In Re Estate of MagdzickiOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API