Legal Opinion

Sheeran v. M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Charles J. Sheeran brought this action against defendants M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. (“MAB”), and Teamsters Local 470 (“Local 470”), under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185; the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, 29 U.S.C. §§ 793 et seq.; and 42 U.S.C. § 1985. Plaintiff also asserts a pendent state claim under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 955. Both defendants have filed motions for summary judgment.

For the most part, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Doe v. ColauttiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener UniversityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  2. Kennard v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Larry v. Penn Truck Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Brown v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  5. Fedor v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API