Sheeran v. M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Charles J. Sheeran brought this action against defendants M. A. Bruder & Sons, Inc. (“MAB”), and Teamsters Local 470 (“Local 470”), under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185; the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, 29 U.S.C. §§ 793 et seq.; and 42 U.S.C. § 1985. Plaintiff also asserts a pendent state claim under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 955. Both defendants have filed motions for summary judgment.
For the most part, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doe v. ColauttiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener UniversityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Kennard v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Larry v. Penn Truck Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Brown v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
- Fedor v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.