Legal Opinion
Fedor v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 12, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-2596PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Kenneth Fedor and William Sheridan originally filed the present action in state court to challenge an arbitrator’s decision upholding their discharge from employment. Defendants Hygrade Food Corporation (“Hygrade”) and Local 195 of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (“Local Union 195”), plaintiffs’ former employer and union local, respectively, subsequently removed the action to federal court because of the alleged existence of federal question jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Presently before the Court is defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- James J. Liotta, an Individual, in No. 79-2124 v. National Forge Company, in No. 79-2252Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shaw v. Russell Trucking Line, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Larry v. Penn Truck Aids, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Nicely v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Fedor, Kenneth and Sheridan, William v. Hygrade Food Products Corporation and u.f.c.w.-local 195Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982