Taylor v. CSX Transportation
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, Senior District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Before the court is Defendant CSX Transportation’s (“CSXT”) motion for summary judgment, filed October 10, 2005. A brief and an evidentiary submission accompany the motion. Plaintiff Shonita L. Taylor (“Ms.Taylor”) submitted a memorandum in response and an evidentiary submission on November 7. Thereafter, on November 14, CSXT filed a reply. 1
CSXT moves for summary judgment on Ms. Taylor’s claims for sexual harassment and retaliation brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“ § 1981”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Givens v. ChambersDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2008
- Loudermilk v. Stillwater Milling Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2008
- Gonzalez v. Sears Holding Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Ferguson v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Jenkins v. Koch Foods, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.