Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Fitzsimmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1915No. 12278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Garfield county, Miller, J., entered February 13, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for partition and an accounting, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This action was brought by the appellants to secure the partition of certain property, alleged to be the community property of Peter A. Peterson and Jane H. Peterson, his wife. Peter A. Peterson filed on a government homestead in July, 1881. He married Jane H. Smelcer in September, 1881. The family settled on the land in October, 1881, a cabin having been erected and some fencing built previous to that time. Jane H. Peterson died in June, 1903. Her estate was administered by her surviving husband. Peter A. Peterson died in August, 1910. N. O. Baldwin is the executor of his last will and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Casassa v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Weber v. DoustWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In re the Estate of FeasWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Crosier v. CudiheeWashington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Domrese v. City of RoslynWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Stewart v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wilshire v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Town of Tukwila v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bloor v. BloorWashington Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API