Casassa v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered July £5, 191£, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action in tort.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Plaintiffs originally brought this action against the city of Seattle and its contractors to recover damages for the sliding of the soil of their lots, caused by the removal of lateral support in regrading certain streets. On plaintiffs’ ■evidence, the action was withdrawn from the jury and dismissed. On appeal, we sustained the dismissal as to the contractors, but remanded the cause for trial as against the city. For a statement of the facts, reference is made to our opinion on that appeal. Casassa v. Seattle, 66 Wash. 146, 119 Pac. 13. On a trial pursuant to that decision, the jury returned…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Woodhouse v. PowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Postel v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Cole v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Hewson v. Peterman Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.