Legal Opinion
Thorberg v. City of Hoquiam
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1914No. 11707PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered July 9, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
In the year 1905, the city council of the city of Hoquiam, by formal resolution, provided for the improvement of a portion of L street, in said city. The intention of the city council is evidenced by a formal resolution wherein it is said, inter alia:
*680“It is the opinion of the said council that the said street should be improved by clearing, grading and removing obstructions from said street full width, and by building a plank roadway thereon, sixteen feet in width, and also by building sidewalks along both sides of said street, eight feet in width, according to the plans and specifications…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stewart v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Folmsbee v. . City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brazil v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Domrese v. City of RoslynWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State Ex Rel. City of Miles v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Kentucky Electric Development Co.'s Receiver v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Wilshire v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.