Legal Opinion
Healthometer Co. v. Jacobs Bros.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1926No. 2300PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
These
are two motions. One is by the defendant for an order requiring plaintiff to furnish further and better particulars of the matters alleged in the bill of complaint, and also for permission to serve and file the interrogatories. annexed to the motion papers.' The only opposition to the motion relates to Nos. 4, 7, and 12,. of the demand for bill of particulars, there being no opposition to the motion to file the interrogatories. The motion will be denied as to demand No. 4 and granted in all other respects.
The other motion is made by the plaintiff for an order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- F. Speidel Co. v. N. Barstow Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
- Wilson v. Union Tool Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1921
- Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. OwenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1923
- Blackmore v. CollinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beacon Folding MacH. Co. v. Rotary MacH. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- Koehring Co. v. Foote Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Frankel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938