Legal Opinion

Neel v. Crittenden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1945No. Appeal, 183PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In tMs case the defendant, an alleged subscriber to the Keystone Indemnity Exchange, resisted the Insurance Commissioner’s suit for the recovery of an assessment imposed upon subscribers to the Exchange by order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. He bases his defense on the allegation that he never signed or filed a power of attorney authorizing an attorney-in-fact to bind him to an exchange of contracts of indemnity among subscribers to the Exchange. The plaintiff entered a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense which the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Seiss v. McClintic-marshall Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Commonwealth v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tribune-Review Publishing Co. v. Westmoreland County Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Giordano v. Johnstone (In Re Packer Avenue Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Yahola Sand & Gravel Company v. MarxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Tribune-Review Publishing Co. v. Westmoreland County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API