Legal Opinion

Fordice v. Gibson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1891No. 14,844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Scott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

McBride, J. —

This was a suit by the appellant to recover of the appellees for the alleged conversion of a lot of staves which the parties agree were of the value of $2,296.86. Both parties claimed title to the staves by purchase from one George S. Beeman.

The facts are substantially as follows: February 4th, 1885, Beeman bought certain land of appellant. The principal value of the land was in the timber growing on it, and Beeman bought it for the purpose of cutting and'utilizing the timber in the manufacture of staves. An unpaid balance of the purchase-price was secured by a mortgage on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. First National Bank v. CrowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Martz v. PutnamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Commercial National Bank v. GilletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Farmers National Bank v. CoynerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Williams v. HewittWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Saint Joseph Hydraulic Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Herring Motor Co. v. Aetna Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API