Commercial National Bank v. Gillette
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The Elkhart Car Company, by a written contract, sold to the appellant 510 car wheels, constituting á part of 1,100 wheels; at the time of the sale the wheels were in one common mass, and there was no separation nor any designation of the wheels sold to the appellant; after the execution of the contract the entire lot of wheels was seized upon executions issued at the' suit of appellee, and this action was; brought for the possession of those sold.
The contention of appellee is that appellant acquired no-title, because the articles sold were not designated or separated from the common lot of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Pleasants v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828
- Bertelson v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Martz v. PutnamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Fordice v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Carpenter v. GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.