Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Gillette

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,661PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The Elkhart Car Company, by a written contract, sold to the appellant 510 car wheels, constituting á part of 1,100 wheels; at the time of the sale the wheels were in one common mass, and there was no separation nor any designation of the wheels sold to the appellant; after the execution of the contract the entire lot of wheels was seized upon executions issued at the' suit of appellee, and this action was; brought for the possession of those sold.

The contention of appellee is that appellant acquired no-title, because the articles sold were not designated or separated from the common lot of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Pleasants v. PendletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828
  3. Bertelson v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Martz v. PutnamIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Fordice v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Carpenter v. GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API