Legal Opinion

Herring Motor Co. v. Aetna Trust & Savings Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1926No. 12,397PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Appellant, by its amended claim and petition for priority filed with appellee, sought to recover, as appellant says, certain shock absorbers shipped by it to the Burpee-Johnson Company, to be exchanged for certain other products manufactured or to be manufactured by said company, and, in the event that said shock absorbers could not be delivered, then to recover the value thereof.

The original claim was filed by appellant and allowed by appellee as a general claim; the amended claim and petition for priority was disallowed by appellee. There was an answer in denial, a trial by the court, and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Gill v. EagletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fordice v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Westfall v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Baltimore & O. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. HassellArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Herder v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Dickinson v. LawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of FranksNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API