Legal Opinion

Collins v. Mullinax East, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2003No. 2002-L-004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nader, Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal taken from a judgment rendered by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas awarding appellee damages under Ohio’s Nonconforming New Motor Vehicle law, R.C. 1345.71 et seq., i.e., Ohio’s “Lemon Law.” The question presented for review is one of first impression and inquires into the scope of a legitimate refund under the statute. To wit, the appellant asks whether a consumer is entitled to recover finance charges incurred on a home equity line of credit when that line of credit is used to purchase a new motor vehicle later determined to be a Lemon. To this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brewer v. BrothersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Royster v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Srail v. RJF International Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fagen v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API