Legal Opinion
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District v. Shank
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1991No. 89-1554PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
One of the great American concerns of this century which was debated and acted upon by *19the United States Congress was that relating to the improvement of our natural environmental resources. Significant among the laws enacted with the public purpose of upgrading our environment were those relating to the quality of the water in our lakes, rivers and streams. Most notable in this regard was the FWPCA. The FWPCA set long-range water quality standard requirements for the states. Section 1251(a), Title 33, U.S. Code. Pursuant to Section 303(c) of the FWPCA, Section 1313(c), Title 33, U.S. Code,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, No. 76-1674Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Henry v. Central National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- New Boston Coke Corp. v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Citizens Committee to Preserve Lake Logan v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Saunders v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Columbus & Franklin County Metropolitan Park District v. ShankOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Fairfield County Board of Commissioners v. NallyOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Gralewski v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Johnson v. KellOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.