Wilson v. Louisiana-Pacific Resources, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, P. J.
The question presented by this appeal, one of first impression and considerable significance, is whether the State of California may constitutionally impose its law requiring cumulative voting by shareholders upon a corporation which is domiciled elsewhere, but whose contacts with California, as measured by various criteria, are greater than those with any other jurisdiction.
Section 2115 of the California Corporations Code 1 provides for the application of various provisions of that code to a foreign corporation which (on the basis of a three-factor formula including…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Draper v. Paul N. Gardner Defined Plan TrustSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.