State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, J.
This is an action against a mutual automobile insurance company incorporated and headquartered in Illinois, where the board of directors holds its meetings. A group of policyholders contends that the insurance company’s board of directors did not pay the dividends it promised. The trial court certified the case as a nationwide class action and ruled that California law, not Illinois law, governs the policyholders’ causes of action.
The insurance company has filed a petition for a writ of mandate, challenging the trial court’s ruling that California law applies. We conclude…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Vaughn v. LJ International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.