Legal Opinion

State v. Kesch

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 1, 1997No. C952331CR; CA A93129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order of restitution entered in his absence. The only issue is whether defendant waived his statutory right to be present at all stages of a trial, including sentencing. See ORS 137.030, ORS 137.040 and ORS 137.106. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

Defendant pled guilty on December 18,1995, to burglary in the first degree and was sentenced to 24 months in prison. During sentencing, the state requested restitution. Defendant objected because the restitution amount lacked documentation. The trial judge postponed sentencing on restitution until the necessary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. ShutoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. SidenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API