In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jordan
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Judge Jordan has petitioned for a rehearing. Although we deny that petition, we believe that because of its contentions our previous opinion should be clarified on three points.
1. The conduct of a judge in talking to a witness.
The petition contends that it is not wrong for a judge to talk to a witness after "the conclusion of a judicial proceeding.” We agree. That is not what happened in this case, however. This case involved a criminal prosecution against Mr. Kueninger in which his -wife was an important witness. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing Judge Jordan talked to Mrs.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re BaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.