Legal Opinion

Burgan v. Lyell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case reserved for tbe opinion of tbis Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPratt, J.

Tbis is an action of assumpsit, brought by tbe plaintiff in tbe Wayne County Court, for work and labor claimed to have been performed for tbe defendants in then- Mining business.

Tbe cause was submitted to tbe Court below, on a written statement, in which it is admitted, that tbe defendants impleaded in this suit, include all tbe members of tbe company; that they all signed tbe original articles of co-partnership, and prosecuted tbe business of mining under them.

*103These concessions thus made, constitute conclusive evidence, as against the defendants, of a partnership in fact, in which they are…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rae v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Manville v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Indiahoma Refining Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Butterfield v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Schmidt v. HortonNevada Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API