Legal Opinion

Childers v. Neely

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1899PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Tyler County. Bill by J. M. Childers and another against S. H. Neely. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge:

Childers and Ramey filed a bill in equity in the circuit court of Tyler against Neely, praying that a partnership between them be dissolved, an account taken “of all its accounts, dealings, and transactions whatever,” and that a manager be appointed to take charge of the property. The business was oil production. Neely admitted the joint *72enterprise, but denied the partnership; and he joined in request for account, and did not resist a dissolution, if a partnership. The decrees made a partial account, decreed its balance against Neely, and denied him further participation, in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lamar's Ex'or v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  2. Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kahn v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Manville v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. The Texas Company v. PetittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Clifton G. Valentine v. Sugar Rock, Inc. and Gerald D. and Teresa D. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Barrett v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Kennedy v. Beets Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API