Legal Opinion

Pratt v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 1981No. 51180PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This is an appeal by the state from a decision of the district court finding a com-pensable taking of plaintiff’s property by reason of a legislative change in the character of the water in three sloughs from private to public. The appeal is from an order denying the state’s motion for a new trial. We remand for further proceedings.

In 1975 the state advised Sheldon Pratt he could no longer harvest the wild rice on his property by mechanical picker but had to do it by hand flailing. Since Mr. Pratt felt this would substantially reduce the profitability of his wild rice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Tyler v. WilkinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1827
  5. McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. St. Croix Waterway v. George MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Application of ChristensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API