Legal Opinion

437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. Boyd

Yonkers City Court

Decided March 11, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

J. Emmett Murphy, J.

This is a summary proceeding to recover possession of real property based on holdover. The building is subject to the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974 ([ETPA] L 1974, ch 576, § 4).

The relevant background facts are as follows: In the summer of 1979, tenant received a timely notice to renew her then-expiring lease. She thereafter left on vacation without notifying the landlord of her election to remain a tenant or quit the premises.

While on vacation in Barbados, she sent a letter to the landlord by ordinary mail forwarding her monthly rent check…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. New York City Housing Authority v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Rosen v. WadeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1979
  5. Hill v. Wek Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blum v. Graceton Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Whitefriars East Co. v. Labyrinth Data Processing Enterprises, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. Paul Ruth Trading Co. v. Royal Yarn Dyeing Corp. (In Re Royal Yarn Dyeing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  4. Cashmere Realty Corp. v. New York City Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API