Legal Opinion
Blum v. Graceton Estates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court properly dismissed the complaint since the stipulation of settlement, dated November 1, 1988, wherein plaintiffs became rent-stabilized tenants of the subject premises, is insufficient to support their claim to a continuing right to the apartment at a rent-stabilized rate. The right to continued renewal leases under the Rent Stabilization Law is not absolute, and coverage may be terminated for various non-fault grounds (Mayflower Assoc. v Gray, NYLJ, Mar. 1, 1994, at 21, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept]), including, as here, high income rent deregulation pursuant to the Rent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. KassisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- 437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. BoydAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1984
- 437 Palisade Avenue Realty Corp. v. BoydYonkers City Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Draper v. Georgia Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Draper v. Georgia Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- East Eleventh Street Associates v. BreslowAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997
- Merwest Realty Corp. v. PragerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1998
- New York University v. EcksteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001