Legal Opinion

Paul Ruth Trading Co. v. Royal Yarn Dyeing Corp. (In Re Royal Yarn Dyeing Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 29, 1990No. 1-11-47606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CONRAD B. DUBERSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Disputes between landlords and tenants are not difficult to find in the bankruptcy court. Landlords are often angered by defaulting tenants who file petitions in bankruptcy either to stay a dispossess proceeding or in the hope of subleasing or assigning valuable properties to other entities at a profit. Nevertheless, the Bankruptcy Code condones such actions regardless of provisions to the contrary in leases in order to afford debtors the opportunity to avail themselves of such benefits in their efforts to reorganize.

FACTS

On July 27, 1948, Royal Yarn…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In Re Albany Partners, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. J. N. A. Realty Corp. v. Cross Bay Chelsea, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Finn v. MeighanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Cale Development Co. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Andover Togs, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. In Re FiberMark, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2006
  4. Caldor, Inc.-NY v. Newburgh Mall Ltd. Partnership (In Re Caldor, Inc.-NY)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API