Legal Opinion

McLain v. Easley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1928No. 20800. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs McLain and wife seek recovery of damages as the alleged result of the negligent operation of a ferry boat belonging to the defendants Easley and Morton.- Trial in the superior court for Franklin county, sitting-with a jury, resulted in a verdict awarding to the plaintiffs recovery in the sum of $600. Thereupon the defendants moved for judgment denying to plaintiffs recovery, notwithstanding the verdict. This motion was by the trial court granted and judgment rendered accordingly. From this disposition of the case in the superior court, the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meisle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Meisle v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pessagno v. Euclid Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Varley v. Consolidated Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Le Master v. ChandlerWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. McLain v. EasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API