Legal Opinion

McLain v. Easley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. 21490. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This case was previously heard on the appeal of the plaintiffs from a judgment non obstante veredicto, 146 Wash. 377, 262 Pac. 975. The judgment was there reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to pass on the defendants’ motion for a new trial. The trial court denied the motion for a new trial, entered judgment on the verdict, and defendants have now appealed from that judgment.

The facts were considered with some detail on the previous appeal and need not again be set forth.

The only errors now assigned which are properly before us relate to instructions given, and if any of these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McLain v. EasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Harris v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matteson v. ThielWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wood v. Washington Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API