Drennon v. Philadelphia General Hospital
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The defendants in this action have filed a Motion to Dismiss both the Complaint and the Amended Complaint for: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; (3) for lack of specificity; and (4) for failure to exhaust both state and federal administrative remedies. The plaintiff contends that she is a highly qualified laboratory technician denied employment at Philadelphia General Hospital solely by reason of her epilepsy. It is claimed that Philadelphia General Hospital and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Novella H. Trageser v. Libbie Rehabilitation Center, Inc., T/a Libbie Convalescent HomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Santiago v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Boxall v. Sequoia Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.