Legal Opinion
Boxall v. Sequoia Union High School District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 9, 1979No. C-78-1588 RFPPublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
This action was brought by David Boxall, a sixteen year old autistic child, and his father, Frank Boxall, seeking injunctive relief and damages for the alleged failure of defendant Sequoia Union High School District (“the District”) to provide David with a “free, public education appropriate to his needs.” Defendants are the District, the State of California (“the State”), San Mateo County (“the County”), and individuals representing those institutions, and it is alleged that their refusal to pay for a full-time private tutor for David in the home of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Sue De La Cruz v. James TormeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Laurice J. Ezratty v. The Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Miener v. State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Anderson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Bureerong v. UvawasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Monahan v. State of Neb.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.