Legal Opinion

Woodyard v. Harper

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 18, 2016No. Misc. No. 2016-0135PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiffs filing of a document entitled “Plaintiff Affidavit of Truth and "[Indisputable Facts” (“Plaintiffs Affidavit” or “Plaintiffs Complaint”). 1 Plaintiffs Affidavit has been docketed by the Clerk of the Court as an initial filing — and as of the date of this Memorandum Opinion, the only filing — in a new miscellaneous action. See ECF No. [1]. However, it appears to the Court that Plaintiffs Affidavit is properly considered as a complaint commencing a civil action, as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Calzada v. RobertsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  2. Colony Insurance Company v. Glenn E. Newcomer ConstructionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Doe v. Northern CA Fertility Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Francis v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Pierre v. Winn Managed Properties, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API