Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 13, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1792PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Vicki R. Nolan brings this pro se action challenging a foreclosure proceeding. In 2005, Nplan used property she owned in Washington, D.C. to secure a mortgage from defendant HSBC Mortgage Corporation. (Compl. p. 4 ¶ 1 and Ex. A). Nolan, subsequently filed a lawsuit in the District of Columbia Superior Court against HSBC and defendant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), which had assumed the loan. See Nolan v. HSBC Mortg. Corp., 16-cv-1265-TSC (D.D.C.), ECF No. 6, ECF pp. 2-4, 33-50. In that suit, Nolan…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitchell v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Pace v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Turan Petroleum Inc. v. Ministry of Oil and Gas of KazakhstanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019