Legal Opinion

Budlong v. Budlong

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1903No. 4215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. George Meade Emory, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

— Appellant, Edith J. Budlong, and her codeiendant in this cause, George E. Budlong, are husband and wife. Respondent, Melissa C. Budlong, was formerly the wife of said George E. Budlong; but the two were divorced by decree of the superior court of King county, Washington, on the 10th day of Kovember, 1893. On the same day the decree of divorce was entered respondent by quitclaim deed conveyed to her said divorced husband *230certain real estate situate in the city of Seattle. The property consisted of a lot and a dwelling house thereon, in which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. McCartWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Herrman v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Swadling v. BarnesonWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barton v. TombariWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pefkaros v. HarmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. Budlong v. BudlongWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sing v. GriblerOregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API